Making games for libraries workshop #libraryplay

21 05 2013

On Monday 13th May I attended this workshop facilitated by Andrew Walsh.

It was ace. I had fun. I learnt some stuff.
The workshop helped me to think how we can try and make library stuff more interesting and engaging for our students in different ways, in this instance using games.
One of my favourite things about this workshop was the practicalness (sorry, I know this is not really a word, but hopefully you know what I mean!) of it.  At the end of the day each group had developed a game to play based on the information need/skill/knowledge that they wanted to address. For our group that was referencing – Referencing Rummy :-)

What our group finished with is a card game about referencing, in our case Harvard, but you can use the idea and apply it to any referencing style.  In a nutshell it’s like rummy, except instead of collecting a suit or a run or whatever, you have to collect all the elements you need to make a complete reference. In this version we had a reference for; a website, a book, a journal article and a British Standard. You can of course vary the resource type. Once you’d collected all the elements of your reference and put them in the correct order you shout ‘Harvard!’ and then you’re the winner. With me? Don’t worry if not, the following summarises our game making journey :-)

Starting off

In the first part of the workshop as well as covering some theory stuff behind the use of games for library learning we were also tasked with creating our game idea/concept in play-doh. For me this was the most diffcult part of the day! I was trying to listen to Andy and follow the presentation of the information he was giving at the same time as freaking out about my play-doh model of my game idea! Ha! Still, I managed it and also managed to say what skill I wanted to address and how the game idea could possibly do that.

This part of the workshop allowed us to identify others that were interested in the same sort of thing and this then formed our Referencing Rummy group.

This is my attempt at moulding my game idea in play-doh… I’m not even going to begin to explain!

Game idea in play-doh form...Ermmm....

Game idea in play-doh form…Ermmm….

Once we were in our groups we looked at the following and began to start developing our game.

  • The challenge you’re addressing -  eg. referencing skills
  • Mechanics – constructs, rules and feedback loops.
  • Audience
  • Constraints
First stages of developing our referencing game

First stages of developing our referencing game

Let the making begin!

Once we’d got a clearer idea of what we wanted to achieve we were let loose on the materials table and started to make our game.

Game making materials

Game making materials

As we were going for a card game, we didn’t need a lot of materials to make our game and so it should be fairly easy to reproduce for us at our respective institutions. An e-template would obviously be better in many ways than our hand written cards.

Playing

We played lots of rounds of Referencing Rummy throughout the day and this allowed us to try out different things; adding in more referencing types, taking a set out etc. It also helped us write the instructions on how to play as well as uncovering any problems. Helen Westwood was also in the Referencing Rummy group and was very good at winning!

Problems

I think our main problem was the number of elements for each reference varied, so we did some squiding together. For example with the website we put the URL and the [Date Accessed] info on one card. Similarly with the journal article we put the volume, issue and pages on the same card. Make of that what you will, but it worked in the game!

Example of a winning reference in this case a website. See also the use of the Joker card. Oooooohhhh...

Example of a winning reference in this case a website. See also the use of the Joker card. Oooooohhhh…

Adding red herrings and jokers

Once we’d established the basics of the game we then started to add in ‘false elements’, cheeky, I know! For example, we slipped in page numbers as an element for a book reference. We also introduced ‘joker’ cards whereby players could substitute a missing element with a joker card. With this you could keep the basic card game for beginners and then introduce the red herrings and jokers for those with a better understanding of referencing to challenge them that bit more.

Developing the game – Instructions

The instructions came last and we had another workshop participant from another group come and play to test the game out with us.Referencing Rummy Instructions

Referencing Rummy Instructions
Referencing Rummy Instruction 2

Referencing Rummy Instruction 2

Using the game in real life

So it’s all very well a load of librarians getting together to play games for a day but will we use this stuff in real life? YES! I’m hoping Referencing Rummy can be used in study skills sessions for the new intake of students in September. I’m already in conversation with the Student Support and Guidance Tutor that puts on the programme of study skills sessions for my School and this will hopefully be a good addition to the programme. These sessions should also reinforce the learning in the big lecture groups I do, where a game like this wouldn’t be appropriate.

So, that’s the plan. Ask me again at Christmas!

I’m also planning on running the InfoBadges action again after a semi-succsessful pilot this semester. I should blog about that in another post really…

Anyway, yes. This will be useful in real life :-)

More library games from the workshop

So this workshop wasn’t all about Referencing Rummy! There were lots of wonderful ideas born during the workshop and at the all of the games were either demonstrated or explained at the end of the day. Andrew made short videos showing each one, (including Referencing Rummy.)

You can have a look at all of the wonderful game ideas in action on Andrew’s Games for Libraries blog

We even got a badge for participating in the workshop :-)
http://badg.us/en-US/badges/badge/Making-games-4-libraries-London/awards/2689

Thanks Andrew for an ace workshop.





Library Camp London #libcampldn – Session 1 – Leadership stuff

3 03 2013
Liza Minnelli at the Royal Festival Hall

Guardian Review 02/03/2013

This weekend I have mostly been in London :-)

Friday night for Liza Minnelli at the Royal Festival Hall, which was just fantastico, yesterday for Library Camp London, which was full on fun and thinking times and today I’m heading to the O2 to see Girls Aloud! Imagine that. A fairly varied mix of activities for a weekend :-)

Anyway, this post focusses on the sessions I went to at Library Camp London. I really enjoy catching up with people as well as meeting new ones at events like this and yesterday was no exception. I have to admit to having a bit of a hazy head after getting a bit over excited at the Liza Minnelli show on Friday night, but the effects of that didn’t kick in until the afternoon! After being shushed and ushered to alternative entrance to Senate House due to some filming going on, I arrived just after 10am and the session pitches were under way. Once they were done I got a glimpse of the lunch table and blimey! There was a lot of food. Library Camp usually involves a lot of cake, but savoury was the theme this time and people had been very generous with supplying a buffet item to make up lunch. Don’t worry though, there was still cake… and sweets and chocolate :-)

So, mad dash to look at the sessions done I headed off to my first choice, a discussion about leadership for people in non-leadership roles. This session was pitched by PennyBinary and I was interested to hear other people’s experiences and ideas about leadership. I’ve always thought of leaders/leadership hand in hand with management and jobs related to that. However, I’m glad to say I got insight into other perspectives during this discussion.

What became clear to me is that people in the group were prepared to take risks to find a solution to a problem or to get a job done. We discussed the nature of our roles; restrictions, expectations, opportunities for collaboration and how as people in non-leadership roles we can still take the lead on projects, making a valuable and valid contribution. I know this seems an obvious thing to say, but sometimes it’s not until I have these conversations that things become clear.
Discussion moved on to what we consider leadership to be and also why we put ourselves into those roles/situations. The what is it all for? question! Broadly speaking two perspectives were identified:
1. The careerists – doing things for the benefit of their own career path
2. The user-community-ists – (sorry I couldn’t think of a good word for this, but hopefully you know what I mean!) doing things for the benefit of the user community.

You sort of fulfill both either way I think. I do think there is a path set out for once you’ve qualified, chartership; get some experience on a CILIP committee etc. and the focus here is developing as an information professional while giving something back to the profession. I’ve always had the impression that these are things that people do to:
1. Further their career
2. Develop specific skills
3. Meet other information professionals outside of their workplace
4. Try and contribute to changes/developments in the profession

Since qualifying in 2008 more varied opportunities have come about to do these things independent of CILIP such as; CPD23 things, the LIS new professionals network, campaigning and advocacy groups, Library Camp unconferences etc.
So by developing my skills and continually learning as an information professional means that I should continually be growing and contributing to improving services to our users.

Whenever I think about leadership and/or management I don’t think I’m naturally cut out for those sorts of roles, especially when I read things like this; What is Leadership?
However, being part of this discussion made me realise that I can make suggestions and try to lead on a small project or bring ideas and make a suggestions on how we could solve a problem or improve a service. Even that small realisation made this session worthwhile for me!

Other themes that came out of these discussions were around people, knowing your management colleagues, what they’re interested in, what they will potentially support you with. Alongside that matching ideas with strategy, what’s in the department strategy, how that fits into the organisation strategy we decided is a sure fire way to get the go ahead and support with an idea, service development.
It seems that there is resistance to trying something new because of the fear of the unknown or the level of risk involved and that was acknowledged as a common thing. Working out how to counter this resistance is where the work lies sometimes. A bit of planning can go a long way in getting people on board and involved in an idea you have it seems.

This a bit of a slimmed down version of the whole discussion but these are the things that stood out for me. I have to say I’m still not a fan of the ‘politics’ of an organisation in that you sometimes have to pick colleagues and approach managers that will potentially support you in what you’re doing. If you can demonstrate how something, for example, will improve the student experience or enhance their information literacy skills then that should be enough. I get it though that different people have different priorities and focus.

I think we all probably do a bit of leadership however informal, so informal that we might not even realise it!
As an aside when I was writing this I kept thinking about the Woman’s Hour Power List 2013 and wonder how they see themselves, whether they consider that they have the qualities of a good leader….

Next post will be tomorrow now as I need to get ready to go out!

Session 2 was the Future of Libraries/Librarians pitched and facilitated by the wonderful Simon Barron.





Aspire bit in eChannel

21 12 2012

You may have already seen that we got a bit about Aspire in the December eChannel.

https://feedback.brighton.ac.uk/echannel/

I wonder if we’ll get any enquiries based on this.





libcampuk12 fun times learning times sharing times

13 11 2012

I went along to this back in October and created my first storify a bit after. Here it is…

[View the story "libcampuk12 fun times learning times sharing times" on Storify]





CILIP Big Day and AGM #CILIPBD12

13 09 2012

Newcastle Library

Today I went along to this event at Newcastle Library and what a fine library it is. The reason I decided to go is that (as I may have mentioned ;-0) I gained chartered status of CILIP earlier in the year and I really welcomed the opportunity to reflect and celebrate not only my success in this achievement but everyone that has achieved ACLIP, MCLIP and Fellowship over the last year.
I think this is important not only as a personal and professional achievement but it also challenges the view that substituting professional library staff with volunteers is not ok. Having volunteers working collaboratively with professional, paid staff, ok, but replacing? No way.

I had mixed feelings following the morning speakers with the broad themes of volunteering and the big society as for me it kind of put a bit of a downer on the whole ‘let’s celebrate the ACLIP, MCLIP, fellowship – professionals!’ bit. As I said on twitter, like others, I’m not against volunteering, I support it, I do it myself (with animals and old people – more of that in a bit) but I think context and appropriateness need consideration. There’s no way I would expect a volunteer to come and do my job. It’s not realistic.

Poppy

That said it did challenge me to think again on whether this approach could work. I don’t think it could. It just doesn’t make sense to me and it raises the questions of the value of the newly revised and overhauled professional knowledge and skills base and qualifications once again.
I said earlier that I volunteer. I do, for a charity called the Cinnamon Trust. My main role is a dog walker, but I’ve done fundraising for them, usually by running a long way and some awareness raising in our local area. At the moment I walk a lovely dog, Poppy, a bichon frisée twice a week for an older lady who has some mobility issues and therefore can’t walk Poppy. So, I walk the dog, but I’m not a vet, a dog trainer, a dog groomer. I often stay and chat to Poppy’s owner about all sorts of things – her housing situation, health, family, friends, telly programmes, but I’m not a counsellor, occupational therapist, carer.  I am well aware of the limitations and boundaries of my volunteering role and the expectations. It’s not realistic for volunteers to replace professional, qualified staff. The advantage that my dog owner has of having me as her volunteer is that as a qualified librarian I can help her find the information she needs about looking after Poppy, health stuff, house stuff :-)
When people find out that I volunteer they are generally very complimentary saying how generous and selfless it is. Well, maybe a bit, but not entirely.  It’s actually a little bit selfish. I love dogs. They’re my favourite. It’s not practical for me to have one so this is ideal. I get some good fun dog time and I’m helping someone out – someone who also loves dogs but can’t provide all things a dog might need.

Anyway, back to the Big Day. Two speakers; Mark Taylor and Ann Rossiter followed talking about digital access for all.

Following the morning speakers was the AGM. That was pretty quick and sort of painless. Membership rates for next year have been frozen and the lifetime member category now closed, although that won’t affect existing members of that category. I’m interested in what the plans are for the subscription model in the future. I do think that there could be more bands for the higher earners. There is a big difference for those earning £20,000 and £30,000 yet the sub is the same. I wonder if it has always been like this or whether there has been a model with more bands and if so why that didn’t work out.
So, there was a also a short presentation from Nick Poole @nickpoole1 covering the money side of things, which I found useful alongside the accounts and report in the AGM pack.

Lord John Shipley opened the afternoon with a heart felt and enthusiastic talk covering the value of libraries, what they mean in communities, the need to have professional staff and contribution that we make in developing and enhancing our society. Yes, I agree. Now we just need to convince everyone else! Well not everyone but the idiotholes that think libraries and librarians are disposable and not necessary and that guy that wrote the article in the Times Higher (more on that in a bit).
This set things up quite nicely for the roof raising presidential address and the counter view point to the volunteering stuff we heard in the morning.
Phil made some valid points delivered in his usual convincing, inspiring and a bit scary way. There was a lot in there, but a point that stood out for me was the notion (and not a new one) that we need to be adaptable, flexible, ready for change, part of the change as the world around is changing so rapidly. I agree we do, but realistically and practically it takes time to change established working practices. It takes time to change organisational culture. It takes time to change a professional body. Our professional body, but we are. Richard Hawkins @usernametaken10 summed it up nicely when talking about the changes at CILIP describing it as an oil tanker, taking a while to change course. I think that’s true of ,any organisations and it takes a strong, visionary leadership to do that with members actively contributing to the decision making processes.

Phil highlighted some of the good, positive changes and activities that CILIP has achieved over the last year and I think it’s important to acknowledge them. It is a day for celebration after all. Phil also went on to highlight the challenges we face not only as a professional body but also as professionals and and as ever it’s important that we respond to those challenges – empowering ourselves and each other to strengthen and improve what we do. He says it’s not enough to save libraries but we also need to improve and develop them. Yes, absolutely, but how can we do that if the people holding the money bags don’t see the value in investing to improve and develop libraries and our services. We are creative with the resources that we have, but they’ll only go so far surely? So we’re back to convincing people, not only how supercool libraries are but how valuable and necessary they are to the communities they serve. We are the heart of our communities. How? Advocacy of course. All of us need to be advocates in any way we feel able.

Phil also spoke about the role of the media in the supporting or slating libraries and the profession. A perfect example of that was being tweeted about today; the article in the Times Higher Education: Working on Borrowed Time? . I mean, what was that? I’ll leave all the articulate people to reply proper as all i can manage is ermmmmmmm…… And maybe a confused and a bit cross face. Seriously though if this is what people are reading and we’re not countering it with stuff that is actually true and makes sense then we’re done for. I’ve just got to say though; did any of us become librarians for this reason?
‘ but several participants in the round-table event doubt whether this would come easy to librarians, a group who, they claim, often “chose their profession because they wanted a quiet life and because they liked being with books rather than people.” ‘

I’m going to hazard a guess and say no way! Who is in this group of ’14 librarians and industry experts’ that they spoke to? Crikey-Blimey-chops! I know I’m totally echo-chambering here, but the librarians and information professionals I know are some of the most forward thinking, hard working, sociable, proactive, creative, innovative people ever. People that are working for the good of their communities, adjusting and changing, responding to challenges, upholding the ethics and morals of the profession.

That was just a snapshot of the presidential address. It was a roof raiser and well received. Let’s hope there’s some action to come out of it from all of us.

Next came the celebrations. Whoo! Whoo! I think this is brilliant idea. I understand that this is the first time ACLIP/MCLIP candidates have been invited to celebrate as well as the Fellows. What better way than to make a day of it with a mix of speakers, chuck the AGM in there too and Bob’s your uncle. Well. It worked for me. I think it’s important acknowledge and celebrate success as well as address the challenges and issues. It’s just  a shame that more people couldn’t be there. Still, a move in the right direction I think.

I liked the short film Richard Hawkins has made which discusses what the qualifications framework is all about. Informative. The only thing missing for me was a candidate perspective, but that is in hand, of course :-)
Yet this is another aspect of CILIP that is under review – the qualifications side of things with the aim of making them more relevant to the information profession again with input and consultation of members as well as employers and library schools.
Good work and congrats to all the ACLIP, MCLIP, Fellows and Honorary Fellows. It is indeed an achievement and a demonstration of our professionalism and commitment to improving and developing our communities which is evidenced in the portfolio.
To close this part of the day there was also the first ever mentor award generously sponsored by the wonderful Biddy Fisher. That was awarded to Gil Young, nominated by Bethan Ruddock.

To summarise I had a good day. It started off shaky but it all made sense as the day went on. I was glad to be part of it. I’m only disappointed I didn’t get any booze and only had a tiny bit of the library tour at the end as I had to go for my train. Still, I’m sure there will be plenty of opportunities for boozing, maybe at Library Camp 2012. Hope to see you there.

Oh and finally. I think there should be more of this. Another highlight from Newcastle Library. Places can be so precious about

Use our loos

their loos!

Librarian Emma





Career Development Group Conference 2012 – Together we are stronger – an organisers perspective

20 07 2012

How about a video blog? Well, that’s what this is. Imagine that.

Here are some links that I refer to in the post:

The call for papers for the conference this year:
http://www.cilip.org.uk/get-involved/special-interest-groups/careerdevelopment/cdg-benefits/events/Pages/cdg-conference-2012.aspx

The programme for the conference this year, the majority of which has come from members/non members submitting a paper.
http://www.cilip.org.uk/get-involved/special-interest-groups/careerdevelopment/cdg-benefits/newprofessionals/Pages/cdg-national-conference-2012-programme.aspx

The call for papers and previous conference programmes.
http://www.cilip.org.uk/get-involved/special-interest-groups/careerdevelopment/cdg-benefits/events/pages/events.aspx

Comments, questions welcome, but I’m on holiday all next week so won’t be checking/responding till I get back.

OK thanks bye…





University Science and Technology Librarians Group Meeting #USTLG

15 05 2012

So, I went to this yesterday. It was in Newcastle. For a bit of context this is a twice-yearly meet up for University Science and Technology Librarians to exchange information and share examples of good practice. I’d seen the call for speakers go round on the mailing list and I volunteered to do a presentation on my first couple of years in this my first professional post; making it my own, which was accepted. I also wanted to take this as an opportunity to get some tips and advice from other librarians in similar subject and liaison roles.
Not only was the first time I’d attended one of these meet ups but also my first time to Newcastle – imagine that! I had to restrain myself from not having a little yelp of excitement when I got a glimpse of the Angel of the North from the train!

I arrived into Newcastle on Sunday evening, had a little walk about to find my hotel for the night – a Travelodge near the Quayside, and after a couple a practice runs of my presentation I watched a bit of the Twilight saga film that was on, wondered why the boys in it were mostly topless in their scenes, got confused about werewolves and vampires and how Bella fitted into all of it (she basically gets to do smooching with boys  – a vampire and a werewolf with no tops on!) and then had a bit of a broken sleep with people coming back from boozing and being all loud – on a Sunday! Who’d have thought it?!
I was also disappointed that there was no peppermint tea at this Travelodge and those of you that know me will know that I normally take my own with me, but I’d forgotten this time. Anyway, I went and asked at reception and they very kindly showed me their whole selection of fruity and standard tea, but no peppermint! Thankfully Timothy Collinson @timpaa came to my rescue the following day with two peppermint tea bags from the superior hotel they were staying at :-)

Anyway, Monday morning arrived and I made my way to Newcastle University, Robinson Library and then to the research hive where our day was being held. First impressions of #USTLG? They are a really friendly bunch. I recognised some people that I’d met at other events @georginahardy @kirsty_thomson @timpaa and Tracy Ainsley from CDG activities and there were of course lots of new people to meet.

In this post I just want to give you an overview of the day, some of my highlights and things I want to follow up on.

In terms of my own presentation, like the New Professionals Day doing this was another opportunity to restore my confidence in my presenting abilities and again I’m glad I went along and did it, even with slight technical hitch of my slides not working from the file saved on my stick. I’d put the slides together in Google Docs so the original was on there. Fortunately the Internet was working without any problem so I was able to do my presentation from that version. Phew! You can have a look at the presentation; The Environment and Technology Librarian – a new professionals perspective, making the role your own on Slideshare.  I concluded the presentation by asking my more experienced USTLG colleagues to share one piece of advice with me to help me to develop my role further – this was requested in tweet or post it format. I didn’t get a full house of responses – but here are a selection of the post it ones I got…

Advice on a post it from colleagues at USTLG

Enough about me, to back track a little bit, the day was opened by Moira Bent, someone who I know through reading her articles and reports about information literacy. Her introduction was followed by a welcome from the Librarian at Newcastle University, Wayne Connolly and now here is a summary of the rest of the presentations and what I found interesting about them.

Jenny Campbell, Newcastle – So what does it mean to be a subject librarian?
In addition to getting an insight into the work of a subject librarian at Newcastle University I enjoyed hearing about the different roles within the role that Jenny identified and could certainly relate to most of them:

  • Teacher
  • Research support
  • Explorer
  • Subject specialist
  • Counsellor
  • Financial manager
  • Politician
  • Project manager

I was also interested to hear about the use of Netvibes and other social media for current awareness services and will follow up on that when I get back to base.

As is the case for so many of use we’re seeing supporting researchers as a growing area and how we respond to this to provide the required support is, how we decide what that provision should be, how and when we deliver it and how and when we review it are all important questions.

Another area that caught my attention, which I realise is not unique to Newcastle is patron driven acquisitions for print and ebooks. This isn’t something that we currently do at Brighton, but it’s something I’d like us to investigate and perhaps trial. Again, something to follow up when I get back.

I really like the idea of employing students to observe the behaviour of other students using the different study spaces of the library and to gather student opinion at Newcastle. An interesting outcome, which Ian Young from Leeds University echoed was that although there was a request from students for more study space they specifically want quiet space, not social learning space. This led on to a bit of discussion about what to call different study areas in the library and how people interpret quiet/silent etc.

Newcastle has also recently had a refurbishment in the Robinson library and as a result a fair amount of stock has been moved to Newcastle University Research Reserve – in Gateshead. Not just storing library materials but other university materials, HR records etc. A good project for the Library to be involved in and good for the library to be managing this space. I was interested to hear that people can access and study in this reserve and I’d have liked to heard more about how this is managed, given the range of materials stored there, but we ran out of time.

Liz Martin, De Montfort – Embedding information literacy teaching in science and engineering

A good summary of where they were with information literacy teaching at De Montfort for Science and Engineering and to compare it to where they are now. Highlights for me with this presentation were:

  • E- induction – This is sent out for people to complete before they even start their course. They can dip in and out, but have to answer questions on each section – this is before they start – late August. No reward at the end, no sanction if it’s not completed. It’s available all year round so if they haven’t done it when they start then they can when they get there.
    This is something I’d like to find out more about and see if it’s effective in getting across those operational aspects of using the library and our services.
  • Self guided tour – This is the follow up to the e-induction.
  • Information literacy – Liz sees all the first years for two hours – embedded in the module, which is a design project which involved a group presentation and report. She is listed on the module as one of the academics.
    Have to show evidence if research and IEEE referencing.For the Technology students – studies in media technology two, one hour sessions. Liz gives the title and they plan the assignment from there. People turned up because they are given the assignment title!
  • Postgrads – two hours for induction. Four hours in their course. I would have liked to have heard more about what’s involved in this, but again, time was of the essence!

Liz went on to say how she got involved in these sessions. Some of it was by chance and other routes included management boards, specifically about plagiarism and referencing as this was from External examiner feedback.

Steve Lee, GlamorganMaking yourself indispensable – Science Community Librarianship
I’d spoken about wanting to become more embedded in my department with my activities as a subject librarian and Steve went on to explain why becoming an embedded librarian wouldn’t work for his and that this isn’t the way to go for all subjects – if there are lots of subjects then how can you embed in all of them?  For specific subjects then he thinks it could work.

However as Steve went on to tell us about his activities and how he is involved with his subject areas I was convinced that he was in fact embedded! Not necessarily physically within the department or organisationally as part of the faculty, but with the activities he is involved in supporting his students and academic colleagues, in my view he is definitely a key part of the team!

Steve’s message was that we should make the lives of our user communities easier by getting out of the library and meeting our users. We should be asking what they want out of the library and with any problems identified try and work with them to see if there’s a plan of action.

Steve also pointed out that our customer needs are different to our own and that we should recognise and respond to that. He also pointed out that we need to trust our user communities rather than expecting the worse case scenario.

There was a section about librarians as facilitators rather than doing things for people. Steve gave an example of us skilling the academics with our content and skills to deliver information literacy sessions rather than us repeating the same sessions year on year. He also pointed out that it was important to review this content with the academics and make any necessary changes.

The thought that instead of being a constant, always there, we should go in and once our job is done – get out and stay out until you need to review needs/wants of user communities!

Steve runs surgeries in the teaching areas during term time for half hour slots. This means he is there regularly at the same time slots to answer any queries, in their working environment.

It was good to hear about another student and academic engagement from a different perspective and I like the idea of getting out into our user communities. I do this already but through modules and meetings rather than specifically to troubleshoot and help with queries.

I would have liked to discuss more what we mean when we say ‘embedded librarian’ and the implications of this term. I feel like I could be doing more in terms of outreach and this sort of community librarian activities, but it’s how to fit it all in!

All of these activities though I see as embedding the librarian in the workings of the department, whether we are physically there or not.

Jenny Brine, Lancaster – From soviet studies to science and engineering

This was a really interesting presentation from Jenny reflecting on her career path, the transferable skills gained and influences along the way. Hearing about how Jenny has got to be in the role that she has now was really interesting. She’s done ever such a lot! So, here is are some of my highlights from her presentation.

Jenny started out as a research associate, embedded in the department and therefore a member of a research team rather than a traditional librarian post which highlighted differing views of what a librarian is. Her subjects there were around Soviet Studies.

Working in interlending and document supply is useful for seeing where the gaps are in our collection as it’s about what our library doesn’t have. In her experience it also gives a good picture of university research and there is the opportunity for direct contact with researchers.

When it came to learning about new subjects as she moved into different posts Jenny used the knowledge of her nearest and dearest in some instances; her husband is a doctor working in the NHS and her two sons are doing PhDs, so there was a good opportunity to get an idea of how a research group works and how they share resources. Jenny found that there was a lot of peer to peer sharing of information and finding resources rather than going to the library or contacting their librarian.

A recommendation to get up to speed with subject knowledge was to read study skills books for new subjects to get a flavour of what the students undertake.

Jenny also made some useful suggestions for USTLG to develop:
- area on website for reports and articles about being a science an technology librarian
- links to useful websites and equivalent groups
- lists of study skills books
- mentoring for new science and technology librarians

All good suggestions for us as a group to take forward.

Selina Lock, Leicester All change! Restructuring academic liaison

Selina took us on a restructuring adventure, the circumstances around it and explained some of the implications this restructure has had on her role and what she might expect from her new role. Selina took us through the reasons for restructure:
- develop research support
- extend, improve and develop online and blended training in information skills
- develop special collections/ digital humanities
- maintain a named contact for each department

She also highlighted the new structure:
- learning and teaching team
- research support team
- across the two teams there are subject clusters

This new structure comes into place on 1st June. A new addition to the learning and teaching team is a manager and two senior library assistants for subject librarian.

I wonder if this move to learning and teaching and research teams is becoming the norm?

It would be good if Selina could come back to USTLG later this year or next year to let us know how things are panning out.

Kirsty Thomson, Heriott-Watt – Hiding your library training in other classes
Kirsty is sneaky! Well, not really, but she did have some good ideas and examples of the approaches and activities she had tried to try and improve students information literacy. She spoke early on in her presentation about ‘optimism bias’ based on the work of Tali Sharot and then moved on to tell us aboutthe work they’ve done in getting the library skills into the introduction to essay writing module, which was in week 2 and 3 of course. This involved looking at writing styles, group work exercise and the activity related to that. Eg. Which texts would you use for academic writing.

Following on from this they also looked at when to reference. This was an activity in pairs and looked at how to recognise when you’re using quotes, other peoples ideas.

The  Introduction to essay writing sessions hid the info literacy aspects within it. Kirsty advised that this makes library and informatin skills more relevant to what they’re doing. More real.

Essays are submitted using Turnitin and then there is a follow up session recapping on what was covered. Kirsty has also had an input on careers sessions covering topics such as researching employers.

So like others today Kirsty worked collaboratively with colleagues in the effective learning team. More advice followed:

Think carefully about what you’re calling your classes eg. Using evidence in your assignment.

Kirsty also had some tips:
- don’t give up on the idea too quickly, but be ready to change classes that aren’t working.

-Link library skills to a assignment. Gives a bit more context.

Tony Wilson, York-  Widening participation: building on the role of the science librarian

I was lookimg forward to hearing from Tony about this aspect of his role. Tony is a liaison librarian and he took on an  unofficial role as the library widening participation coordinator.

TheLibrary was invited by the university widening participation to  assist in putting on an event with the WP office as well as learning enhancement team and others. Involved in developing independent learning day.

This was June 2009 and repeated in September 2009 for specific schools.

The Library session was called researching and evaluating information. Additional sessions included academic writing, referencing, academic integrity, tour of the library, library challenge, chance to talk to student ambassadors.

Tips:

-Make use of the student ambassadors with these events.

-Aim to work more closely with other university departments.

As Tony pointed out as this aspect grew and developed it became too much for one person

Then the requests came for extended project qualification ( EPQ)- universities are considering this for entry.

Typical content for researching and evaluating information workshop
- sources of information
- effective searching
- Getting the most out of google
- evaluating websites
- the hotseat – describe the ‘term’ without using the word.

Not just 6th forms! Some stuff for school age and primary schools.
Currently investigating new exercises and materials for these events. Collaboration with teachers.

Why do this?
- gives a good insight into pre university student skills
- find out about wider, free resources
- help WP agenda
- widening participation is now a key part of the library activities. Iexpected that this will become a standard part of an academic liaison.

I’d spoken to colleagues at Sussex about their work with the EPQ and other activities with school/ college groups and that was after hearing about it at the first Brighton Libteachmeet which was just short of a year ago. Again hearing from Tony about this has once more sparked my interest in this area.

We’re already involved in a number of projects and so I can’t imagine doing anything about this practically at this time, but certainly something that I think is important and would be good to devote some time to, even if it’s just to find out about what happens centrally with WP and where we could add to those activities.

So there we go, a very quick round up of my day at #USTLG.

Maybe my chartership post will be finished soon but we’ve the reflective writing session and the first Sussex tweet up tomorrow…








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,135 other followers